I think there are a lot of deists and non-fundamentalists that I wouldn't bother with, so I guess that makes me, what, 70% anti-theist? I would call it active atheism because I actively promote atheist philosophy when I can, and I dont actively promote theist philosophy, so I must be 100% anti-theist. How do you suggest we correct the hundreds of years of anti-atheism?
I would not bother with the pantheists, deists, or non-fundamentalists because they are mostly very open minded about the progress in our understanding of nature by natural methodology. Most of these characters I have encountered still rely on the fringe of our understanding as the evidence for their deity, and I don't have much of a problem with that deity. They also aren't so much opposed to moral progress.
I do actively promote atheism especially atheism based on natural philosophy such as metaphysical naturalism, and I'm a bit annoyed at the fact that many atheists talk about anti-theism as if it were a bad thing beyond its negative wording.
No comments:
Post a Comment